Although the Mirena warning label does include information about the potential risk of the IUD perforating the uterus, it suggests that the risk only exists at the time the doctor inserts the device. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Mirena IUD Side Effects and Complications. Paragard IUD lawsuits are now in the early stages of multidistrict litigation (MDL) consolidation in Philadelphia and more lawsuits are under investigation. Mirena Lawsuit. Bayer offered to settle some perforation lawsuits for $12.2 million.Board-certified physicians medically review Drugwatch content to ensure its accuracy and quality.Drugwatch partners with Physicians’ Review Network Inc. to enlist specialists. However, as required by the new California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), you may record your preference to view or remove your personal information by completing the form below.Injured by a prescription drug or defective medical device?Trial Attorney and Pharmaceutical Litigation ExpertTrial Attorney and Pharmaceutical Litigation ExpertOrgan perforation, device migration, ectopic pregnancy, pseudotumor cerebriOrgan perforation, device migration, ectopic pregnancy, pseudotumor cerebri For more information, visit our Join our newsletter to stay up to date on dangerous drugs and devices, keep up on lawsuit and settlement news, learn about FDA recalls, and more.Keep people safe from potentially harmful drugs, medical devices and procedures by informing them of medical conditions, severe side effects and ways to take action.The information on this website is proprietary and protected. This term means “false brain tumor.” Unlike perforation or migration claims that deal with physical damage related to the IUD moving from the uterus, these claims say the hormone inside Mirena, levonorgestrel, is to blame.The hormone can cause an abnormal elevation of cerebrospinal fluid in the skull, resulting in pseudotumor cerebri (also known as idiopathic intracranial hypertension).According to these lawsuits, Bayer misled plaintiffs about the implant’s safety by not properly explaining how the hormone works. For more information, visit our Drugwatch.com doesn’t believe in selling customer information. If you used Bayer’s Mirena IUD device and you have since experienced a serious complication, contact our skilled attorneys at AMA Law today.According to Donovan’s lawsuit, her doctor inserted the Mirena intrauterine device (IUD), a small, T-shaped piece of plastic designed to remain in the uterus and prevent pregnancy for up to five years, in October 2006. Discovery is ongoing.Like the New York MDL, Mirena lawsuits in New Jersey say the IUD migrated and caused injuries. Mirena manufacturer Bayer says the device is at least 99 percent effective in preventing pregnancy and does not decrease the chance of pregnancy after it is removed. PRN is a nationally recognized leader in providing independent medical reviews.Reviewer specialties include internal medicine, gastroenterology, oncology, orthopedic surgery and psychiatry.Mirena lawsuits accuse Bayer Pharmaceuticals of hiding side effects and making a defective intrauterine uterine device (IUD). Lawyers drafted the master settlement agreement in April 2018.As of Aug. 17, 2018, Bayer estimated the settlement would include 4,600 claims. Mirena has resulted in severe side effects, some of which have altered women’s life or cost thousands to fix. In April 2018, plaintiffs and defendants gathered to go over the medical and scientific issues surrounding Mirena, according to the court docket. The Mirena IUD is a t-shaped intrauterine device which, when implanted in the patient’s uterus by a clinician, claims to prevent pregnancy for up to five years. Both are in the Southern District of New York. Mirena is a hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) that can provide long-term birth control (contraception). © COPYRIGHT 2020 AMA LAW - Developed and Designed by It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. While there is not yet a recall of the product, if the numbers of women who report problems continues to increase, the likelihood of a Mirena IUD recall in the future is highly probable. Women blame the birth control device for organ perforation, dislodging from the uterus and causing pressure buildup in the skull. A New York woman has filed a product liability lawsuit against Bayer, claiming that she became pregnant while using the company’s Mirena IUD and suffered numerous complications requiring surgery, because the device perforated her uterus and migrated into her abdomen. As of April 2019, only one case was still pending in the MDL.In the newest group of Mirena lawsuits, women in MDL 2767 claim Mirena caused pseudotumor cerebri. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation.